Hello. On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 6:29 AM, Patrick R. Michaud <[email protected]> wrote: > Version T1 T2 T3 T4 Fastest vs 2011.01 > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > bench-s1 -- core.pm: > 2011.01/3.0 (ms2) 254 279 278 275 254 100.0% > 2011.02/3.1 (ms2) 320 321 320 321 320 126.0% > 2011.03/3.2 (gms) 264 263 263 264 263 103.5% > 2011.04/3.3 (gms) 291 292 293 290 290 114.2%
I don't understand this at all... Results on one of my boxes (Debian, i386, 32 bits, 4GB): Testing 2011.01 2011.01 run 1: 133 secs 2011.01 run 2: 139 secs 2011.01 run 3: 139 secs Testing 2011.02 2011.02 run 1: 147 secs 2011.02 run 2: 147 secs 2011.02 run 3: 150 secs Testing 2011.03 2011.03 run 1: 81 secs 2011.03 run 2: 82 secs 2011.03 run 3: 81 secs Testing 2011.04 2011.04 run 1: 82 secs 2011.04 run 2: 82 secs 2011.04 run 3: 82 secs This results obtained in same way as jnthn++ in https://gist.github.com/953615 Looks like we have major regression on amd64. -- Bacek _______________________________________________ http://lists.parrot.org/mailman/listinfo/parrot-dev
