Hello. On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 8:49 PM, Richard Hainsworth <[email protected]> wrote: > It seems to me that NQP should fork into two similar but different > languages, one for Parrot's tool chain, and one for Rakudo's target. If they > were called different things, it would keep the two contexts clear.
Strong -1 from me. "Parrot" developers doesn't have resources to maintain own very-similar-but-slightly-different version of NQP. "use parrot;" with probably dinamically adjusted grammar and exposing of all underlying parrot features is much better solution. -- Bacek _______________________________________________ http://lists.parrot.org/mailman/listinfo/parrot-dev
