George Czerw posted on Sat, 31 Mar 2012 14:05:42 -0400 as excerpted: > On Saturday, March 31, 2012 01:20:57 pm Heinrich Mueller wrote:
> Yeah, I did that and got Pan 0.136 GIT 72905f5 running. What I don't > understand is why I got no errors when compiling Pan 0.135 GIT 0a70b74 > on the same system back in September 1911? _19_11?? /That/ would explain!!! ... And I thought I was bad still trying to write the _year_ before in March and April, never mind the century or millennium! =:^) (Actually, I had the 19... problem along about 2008 or so, IIRC.) Anyway, there have been quite some changes since Sept, _20_11. IIRC Heinrich's experimental repo (originally on github) with all the new goodies in it was only merged to pan's official gnome-hosted git after the new year, tho it's possible I'm mistaken on that as I didn't actually go back to look. But that's where the major new features came from, and with them a lot of new and refactored code. So if you last pulled pan's official git before that merge, it's no wonder at all that you're having problems now that didn't exist then. The code back then was pretty much the same code, but for minor updates, that it was when Charles left it at about 0.132 era, if not earlier. Now, there's whole new major features, etc, bringing in whole new dependencies, etc, as well. AFAIK the dbus code supports pan's optional new systray icon and/or notifications feature. So yes, it's new code that wouldn't have been there back in Sept, 2011. As Heinrich says tho, it's configure-script optional. -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman _______________________________________________ Pan-users mailing list Pan-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users
