Am Tue, 13 Dec 2011 08:30:00 +0000 schrieb Duncan: > Heinrich Müller posted on Mon, 12 Dec 2011 21:09:59 +0000 as excerpted: > >> Am Mon, 12 Dec 2011 19:10:32 +0000 schrieb Duncan: > >>> I just had pan lose track of my signatures. When I tried to post >>> without a sig the message sure looked odd! >>> >>> I was able to go back into the posting profiles and reset them > >> Does the setting stay, now? > > It seems to. I even just now saved-as-draft and restarted pan to be > sure it didn't lose the setting with a restart, and all is fine. It's > as if the name of the setting in the file changed and it couldn't read > the old setting, but as soon as the one under the new name was set, > everything was fine. (Or as I mentioned, perhaps it was the gmime slot > update, from 2.4 to 2.6. Not likely, but if you didn't change anything > related to that code... but the changes related to gnome-keyring looked > invasive enough and close enough in git... even if I don't claim to > actually be able to read the code.) > Ok, good to hear. I'll most likely do a branch with gmime 2.6 exchanging my code with gmime's. >>> Meanwhile, it may well have /been/ pan changes, because there's been >>> quite a bit of change, recently. pan now handles gpg >>> signing/encryption/verification, at least if built against the >>> appropriate libs. I have gpg but don't use gnome and thus don't have >>> gnome-keyring installed, so don't expect I see the full featureset. > >> gpg works without gnome-keyring. it uses a gtk dialog afaik. > > How does the verification work? I see a lot of red ribbons, which I > took to mean signed but unverified, because I don't have the pieces in > place to do verification. But it'd sure be nice to have it... > The verification works with gpgme functions. Too long to explain, but basically all I do is look for gpg tags,extract the message text and then verify. What's tricky is to veriy gpg-signed/attached messages. > I tried clicking on the red ribbon, expecting maybe a dialog, and > hovering, looking for a tooltip, but nothing with the hover and all the > click did was collapse the header bar. Yes, that's still a bug I have to inspect. > > ** Talking about which... it has always been a minor irritant of mine > that clicking it when expanded collapses it but clicking it when > collapsed doesn't expand it. Seems to me that should be a simple enough > fix? TIA. =:^) Yes, put on my to-do-list. ;) Will be in master, as it'll be a stable fix.
_______________________________________________ Pan-users mailing list Pan-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users
