On Mon, 03 Oct 2011 20:18:16 +0000, Bruce Bowler wrote: > If so, there's a feature that I'd like to request (and at the same time > an inconsistent behaviour to report). > > It would be nice to have a way to mark a whole thread read regardless of > the expanded (or not) state of the thread. > > Currently, if a thread is collapsed and one right clicks and select > "mark article as read", the thread is expanded and all articles in the > thread are marked as read". If the the thread is already expanded, the > same action only marks the current article read. > > My opinion is that the "thread collapsed" behaviour is incorrect. > > However, it would be nice if there were another option (or 2) on the > right- click context menu to "mark thread as read" (and perhaps "mark > thread as unread") > > Even though I'm a programmer, I don't feel competent enough to suggest > the necessary patches as I'm an "old school" Fortran hacker (in the > good, not pejorative, sense of the work). >
Funnily enough, I was thinking the very same thing earlier this morning. I think both options are necessary as I'm sure I'd need "mark thread as unread" to follow on a "darn it, I didn't mean that thread" action of mine. "Old school" Fortran hackers think alike. ;-) -- Graham Davis, Bracknell, Berks. E-mail: change boy to man LibreOffice: http://www.documentfoundation.org/ openSUSE Linux: http://www.opensuse.org/en/ _______________________________________________ Pan-users mailing list Pan-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users
