On Sat, 09 Apr 2011 17:12:10 +0000, Graham P Davis wrote: > On Sat, 09 Apr 2011 13:30:06 +0000, Duncan wrote: > >> Graham Peter Davis posted on Sat, 09 Apr 2011 11:35:22 +0000 as >> excerpted: >> >>> I've tried the same sig file with knode and a different file with pan >>> and had no trouble. So why is this file behaving so oddly? >> >> Interesting. I've no idea. But do you have it set as a sig file, >> command, or literal text? If you have it set as a file, what happens >> if you set it to command and cat the file (use the cat command, >> assuming *ix of course)? >> >> I assume you've checked to see that there's only one copy in the file >> itself? What happens if you create a new text file and copy the >> desired sig there, then use it? > > Tried copying into a new file but no difference. Hacked a few lines off > it and hey presto!
I cut it down to only three lines, typed the whole quote in again in a new file, changed character-encoding (from UTF-8 to ISO-8859-15), entered it as text instead of a text file, and still it duplicated. I have the horrible feeling that I may have to try adding it in one word - or one character? - at a time. This has all begun to feel very familiar. I remember having this same trouble a year or so ago with 0.133 (I'm now using 0.134) but with a totally different sig. As that release was already giving me more trouble than TB or knode, I gave up. Chickens coming home to roost? I'll keep experimenting and will return when and if I find the cause. Here's another longish sig but one which gives no trouble. Weird! -- Graham Davis, Bracknell, Berks. E-mail: change boy to man openSUSE 11.4; KDE 4.6.00; AMD Athlon X2 Dual Core Processor 5000+; Video: Radeon HD 2400 Pro; Sound: MCP61 HDA (nVidia); Wireless: BCM4318 _______________________________________________ Pan-users mailing list Pan-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users
