On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 00:33:18 +0000, Duncan wrote: > Paul Johnson posted on Tue, 17 Aug 2010 12:56:01 -0700 as excerpted: > >> On Sun, 08 Aug 2010 21:38:53 +0000, Duncan wrote: >> >>> So now you need to know how to score a thread, right? To score a >>> thread to something other than watched or ignored, simply add a >>> scoring rule, on the second line of the dialog, set "and the >>> article's" REFERENCES, CONTAINS, and either take the default or set >>> the appropriate message-id. >> >> OK, that's what I'm looking for. So how do I change the scoring >> defaults done by the "Watch Thread" and "Ignore Thread" macros so >> they're not worthless? Alternately, how do I remove those and replace >> them with my own? Having to manually add a scoring rule through the >> long-form dialogue is time consuming and annoying to say the least. > > AFAIK that's be a source code change if you were to do it. Not too bad. > But it shouldn't be an issue. See, ignored/watched are /supposed/ to be > extremes.
I get that, but why set the score to a specific value, rather than raising or lowering it? Tin's scoring and "quick highlight/kill" function is configurable, so I can't imagine why it hasn't caught on in pan. Having a thread highlighted is kind of annoying when it quashes author scores. > And if for some reason you don't like it that way, it's all > relative, so just multiply your other scores by 1000 or 10,000 or > whatever. No big deal... (tho the score color coding is hard-coded to > specific ranges as well, so if you want to use that with > ignored/watched, you'd need to change the source for either the color > code ranges or ignored/watched). That's not so much an issue. _______________________________________________ Pan-users mailing list Pan-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users
