On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 05:35:57 +0000, Duncan wrote: > Jim Henderson posted on Wed, 30 Sep 2009 01:28:19 +0000 as excerpted: > >> On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 21:17:26 -0400, Wayne E. Nail wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 21:40 +0000, Jim Henderson wrote: >>>> showstoppers >>> >>>> Posting attachments, completing the scoring/rules engine? >>>> >>>> Jim >>>> >>>> >>> At the risk of introducing something completely outside the spirit of >>> this update... >>> >>> ... does 'posting attachments' refer to the ability to post binaries? >>> >>> If it does, then it would be wonderful if that was ... maybe not >>> fixed, so much as... included? >> >> Yes - I seem to recall that this was on the roadmap; that's why I >> mentioned it. :-) > > Looks like Charles is looking for bugs right now, not feature requests. > And while attachments would be a very nice thing, something I certainly > want too (and something that /had/ been on the roadmap for 1.0, as you > point out), it's a feature request.
Fair enough. :-) Jim -- Jim Henderson Please keep on-topic replies on the list so everyone benefits _______________________________________________ Pan-users mailing list Pan-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users
