On 2009-07-10 06:02, Duncan wrote:
Ron Johnson <ron.l.john...@cox.net> posted
[snip]

*Something* so that a 10KB change in tasks does not require a 300MB file
to be written to disk.

I still believe that's barking up the wrong tree, at least for tasks.nzb (the 3+ gig header file for a single group is a different matter entirely).

But I see the "constant tasks.nzb" writing (and stalling) even when I'm not viewing alt.binaries.dvdr

So it *can't* be the wrong tree.

[snip]
be a big issue. (That's why I didn't make it a set number of downloads; if it were adjusted for dialup, basically write at every update, like we have now, it'd be a performance killer for broadband,

*Is*, not "would be".

while if we adjusted for broadband, losing perhaps hours of state on dialup would be VERY frustrating,

Too true.

--
Scooty Puff, Sr
The Doom-Bringer


_______________________________________________
Pan-users mailing list
Pan-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users

Reply via email to