----- Original Message ----- From: "walt" <w41...@gmail.com> To: <pan-users@nongnu.org> Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 17:33 PM Subject: [Pan-users] Re: a little something for the pan heads
> On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:17:56 -0700, Travis wrote: > >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "walt" <w41...@gmail.com> To: >> <pan-users@nongnu.org> Sent: Tuesday, June >> 23, 2009 17:14 PM Subject: [Pan-users] Re: a little something for the >> pan heads >> >> >>> As we used to say back in the day, "Wow, psychedelic, man!" >> >> <snip> >> >> Maybe it is because he sends his messages as attachments. > > Good point, Travis. Actually it's not his replies that are attachments, > it's his digital GPG signatures, and I believe that pan is indeed getting > confused by that. Here are the error messages from pan/git, which do not > appear when I use pan/svn: > > (pan:10643): gmime-CRITICAL **: g_mime_object_get_content_type: assertion > `GMIME_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed > > (pan:10643): gmime-CRITICAL **: g_mime_content_type_is_type: assertion > `GMIME_IS_CONTENT_TYPE (mime_type)' failed > > (pan:10643): gmime-CRITICAL **: g_mime_multipart_insert: assertion > `GMIME_IS_OBJECT (part)' failed > > (pan:10643): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_unref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT > (object)' failed His very first message came through normally to me but the next two were attachments as was his sig. -- Travis in Shoreline Washington _______________________________________________ Pan-users mailing list Pan-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users
