On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 20:08:48 +0000, Duncan wrote:
> But there's not an ethical requirement. That's what I've been saying. ... > Requiring, either ethically or legally, that they use a particular name, > is quite something else, and that makes it unfree, whether that > requirement is legal or just claimed ethical. You criticize RMS for "requiring, either ethically or legally, that they use a particular name", but you concede that there is no legal requirement, so you must mean an ethical requirement. But you've just said above "there's not an ethical requirement". This is confused. -- Greg _______________________________________________ Pan-users mailing list Pan-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users
