On Tue, 05 Aug 2008 05:46:32 +0000, Duncan wrote: > GL's suggestion, I think, was that it was just taking the time to sort > all those headers, and there wasn't a lot that could be done about it.
Yes, I think Pan needs the time, but that doesn't quite mean there's no fix. If the problem is the prevention of window system updates for the last part of a header update, as I think it is, it might work to insert a sleep command into the busy loop, if you can identify that loop. -- Greg _______________________________________________ Pan-users mailing list Pan-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users
