On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 8:46 PM, Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Daniel Rahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted > [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Mon, 31 > Mar 2008 08:33:49 +0200: > > > That's because the version check in glib-compat.h fails and the function > > names in pan code are therefore replace with NULL. Therefore the "_" > > from the function options stay as the only function call. > > OK, that makes sense. > > > So now the question is why the version check fails. Question number two > > is why it even matters on your system. > > > > If your up to, I'd like to debug that off list. Drop me a mail if you're > > brave ;) > > This one's going to both list and you, if I got the address right (gmane > encrypts them for this list so I had to do a bit of sleuthing). Either > way, you can reply to me directly. > > -- > Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. > "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- > and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pan-users mailing list > Pan-users@nongnu.org > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users >
Here's another patch for Pan against Gnome 2.22 fixing g_assert problems http://mail.gnome.org/archives/garnome-list/2008-April/msg00000.html
_______________________________________________ Pan-users mailing list Pan-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users
