On Saturday 20 October 2007, Dave Chand wrote: > I like Brian's patch, but I wonder what changed from gtk+2.10 to gtk > +2.12, to cause this problem? > Is it a pan bug or a gtk bug? Please let us know what Matthias has to > say about this. > I filed a bug against gtk+2.0 with all the information from this list. Here's the reply from the maintainer:
On Saturday 20 October 2007, Loïc Minier wrote: > I just loaded a 530 KB image with the gdk-pixbuf loader mechanism > (with the gtk-demo program) and it worked fine. Please provide a > sample picture and mention which part of Gtk API you're using if that's > relevant. > > For reference, this is what identify told me on the test image I used: > /usr/share/gtk-2.0/demo/alphatest.png JPEG 2048x1536 DirectClass 573kb > > You can test gdk-pixbuf loaders by overwriting the above image from > gtk2.0-examples and running "Images" from gtk-demo. Doesn't answer the question about who's responsible but the gtk folks will want more facts. Since I can't answer to pan's implementation of the library, I asked Loic to await data from real pan coders. stevem _______________________________________________ Pan-users mailing list Pan-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users
