On Fri 10 Aug 2007 at 01:11:22 +0000, walt wrote: > Evidently your expectations are in accord with common practice, but > I'm not clear on why this practice is the norm. Is this part of the > mime specs? And what about the case where the 'attachments' just > happen to be text/plain also. Is there something in the mime specs > which requires the 'attached' text/plain to be flagged in some way > as different from the 'body' text/plain?
I believe I have seen mails that have the "attachment" in the middle, between two text/plain parts. I think my mail program (mutt) displayed both parts of text, leaving out the "attachment", with indications about what it is doing. -Olaf. -- ___ Olaf 'Rhialto' Seibert -- You author it, and I'll reader it. \X/ rhialto/at/xs4all.nl -- Cetero censeo "authored" delendum esse. _______________________________________________ Pan-users mailing list Pan-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users
