Charles Kerr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Rhialto wrote: >> On Sun 04 Feb 2007 at 04:12:47 +0000, walt wrote: >>> Are you compiling on a non-linux system? I'm wondering if you need to >>> use 'gmake' instead of 'make'. Just a wild guess. >> >> Before, as I reported, it always worked with standard make rather than >> gmake. > >For what it's worth, nothing's been changed in the autoconf parts, or in >the po directory (except for updated translations).
Sorry, but this is clearly not the case: po/Makefile.in.in now uses the gmake-specific $(shell ...) construct: $ grep shell pan-0.121/po/Makefile.in.in $ grep shell pan-0.122/po/Makefile.in.in PO_LINGUAS=$(shell if test -r $(srcdir)/LINGUAS; then grep -v "^\#" $(srcdir)/LINGUAS; fi) POFILES=$(shell if test -n "$(PO_LINGUAS)"; then LINGUAS="$(PO_LINGUAS)"; else LINGUAS="$(ALL_LINGUAS)"; fi; for lang in $$LINGUAS; do printf "$$lang.po "; done) CATALOGS=$(shell if test -n "$(PO_LINGUAS)"; then LINGUAS="$(PO_LINGUAS)"; else LINGUAS="$(ALL_LINGUAS)"; fi; for lang in $$LINGUAS; do printf "$$lang.gmo "; done) The toplevel configure still sets POFILES and CATALOGS in .122, but these settings are apparently thrown away; PO_LINGUAS seems to be new in .122. --Per Hedeland _______________________________________________ Pan-users mailing list Pan-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users
