Darren Albers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Duncan wrote: >> Per Hedeland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted >> [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sun, >> 07 Jan 2007 16:08:50 +0100: >> >> >>> There was some discussion/complaints/bug-reporting about how new-pan saved >>> articles in random order rather than first-to-last (or last-to-first:-). I >>> didn't follow it too closely, but it seems to be fixed now - however the >>> "Cache Article" function still processes articles in random order, which I >>> personally find much more annoying. >>> >> >> >>> Anyway, I filed a bug with patch for this, #393912 - hopefully it can >>> sneak in before 1.0 since it's quite straightforward. >>> >> >> Cool! I can sure use that here, too, as the bug has been irritating me, >> but I was living with it as it seemed I must be the only one downloading >> to cache since no one else seemed to be complaining. >> >> Very glad to actually have a patch. Maybe it'll be integrated now (altho >> I'd not hold up 1.0 for this, but if something else was going in before >> 1.0 and there was going to be another beta/rc, I'd want it in). >> >> > >Same here! I hope it makes it for release but if it doesn't I can >always patch my local package. Thanks Per!
Thanks for the thanks - unfortunately, saying that it was "straightforward" was of course guaranteed to make it turn out to be wrong:-), though at least it didn't make things worse than before. I've added a very small patch to be applied on top of the previous one to the bug report, and now I really think it's right... (no, wait, I never said that!:-). (Btw, I'm not sure my assumption about sorting by age by default is completely correct, b/c the original patch definitely worked with "small" selections that had the header pane sorted by article *size* just for testing.) --Per _______________________________________________ Pan-users mailing list Pan-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users
