Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sun, 05 Nov 2006 08:38:59 +0000:
> That's my take. Now to go mention it on the bug. Only I think I'll > simply point here for it as I think I made the point better here than I > likely could again. Hmm... Looks like Charles has already commented -- the same beginning thing, I was right on that, but a bit different angle. Still... maybe this angle might be worth exploring... We'll have to see what Charles says. In any case, as I said, if the single-part vs single attachment forming a single logical pan task unit is correct, it doesn't appear to have been something Charles has considered at all, so the fix is likely to be somewhat major surgury, unlikely to happen before 1.0. -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman _______________________________________________ Pan-users mailing list Pan-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users
