Charles Kerr wrote: > So that cleanup work http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=354405 > is a step backwards. oh, well, I guess it's not unreasonable to limit > win2k to ipv4. > It wasn't a step backwards, I just changed the define so I could test it. > Is there a way to get ipv6 for xp without having two separate > windows binaries? >
I've just found something that should work. I'll post it to the bug when it's done.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pan-users mailing list Pan-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users
