I finally got around to dredging up my bugzilla account info and either added or wonder about these bugs before 1.0. I'm posting them here so others can see them and chime in if desired.
1. Keyboard accel for download new messages in group, and new messages in subscribed groups, suggested "a" and "shift-a": http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=342032 2. Of course, customized accels as in old-pan would eliminate the entire bug class. =8^) http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348660 3. Reminder: news server delete functionality. This one should probably be a pre-1.0 must-fix, but you likely know that and just forgot when you made the .104 announcement: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=337319 4. Thanks for getting the per-group posting-profile thing pre-1.0. =8^) Might it be possible to make the posting server a function of the posting profile? It's not a big issue for me presently as my groups are server-exclusive where it counts, but several have requested a way to control what server gets used for posting (posting using the wrong one can be embarrassing or even dangerous, particularly for things like posts to to the net-abuse groups from servers using unmunged nntp-posting-host -- talk about an expressway to cracker-target!), and making that part of posting profile seems about the most intuitive way to manage it than I can figure. Given the potential user risk, and the greater exposure 1.0 will have, IMO getting posting server prefs of /some/ sort into 1.0 should be seriously considered, anyway. http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348667 5. Minor UI consistency bug: In the news server and posting profiles dialogs, double-clicking an entry should behave as if the modify button were pushed. It does for news servers, but not for posting profiles. http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348669 I don't necessarily expect all of those to make it into 1.0, but the delete server could be considered "completion", and the posting server could be considered almost a security issue (I say that despite the fact that it's not directly affecting me ATM), so those two are the ones I'd personally consider most vital for 1.0. The others would be nice, but we can do without for now, if they don't make it. (OTOH, I'd guess except for customized accels, the others should be trivial to fix. The big one is probably posting server selection and as I said IMO it's a risk thing and should therefore be fixed before the wide use of a stable, so...) -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman _______________________________________________ Pan-users mailing list Pan-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users
