----Original Message---- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] u.org] On Behalf Of Duncan Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2006 22:11 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Pan-users] Re: RE: Re: Re: Headers..
> "Travis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted > [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sun, 28 > May 2006 10:19:58 -0700: > >> [Duncan ...] >> >>> [Brad Rogers...] >>> >>>> I always include an X-Offender header. Does that help? :-) >>> >>> Interesting, that. Why? Well, when I collected the mail last >>> night, there was one of those state "Sex Offender Notification" >>> things in the mail. >>> >>> (se)x-offender? >>> >>> (In this case, he's considered a medium risk, the threshhold for the >>> mandatory notification. Seems a few years ago he got caught in a >>> consensual relationship with a 14-year-old, who considered him her >>> boyfriend. He was 22 at the time, going by the date and his age >>> now. 22-14 consensual? IMO, that makes him the victim -- of the >>> state. <shrug>) >> >> So you think the age of consent in your state should be 14? > > It's a bit more complicated than that, actually. I prefer an age > difference standard. At that age difference, I'd say misdemeanor and > not subject to sex offender registration, not felony, tho a > 25/14 range would be a felony and thus be subject to > registration (and a 16/14 range wouldn't be the state's > business at all beyond ensuring it's consensual and enforcing > public decency standards, so if it's in the home, not lover's > lane... and notifying the parents, of course) > > If you wish to discuss further, I'm game, but please let's > take it to private mail, since it's off topic for the list. My last comment. If you think an 8 year difference is not a felony then I wonder about you. -- Travis in Shoreline Washington _______________________________________________ Pan-users mailing list Pan-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users
