walt wrote:
I see that 0.96 already has this patch, and it's behavior
is slightly different but no better, alas:
Ha! Well, let's try again. Here's a patch against 0.96.
--- pan/gui/header-pane.cc.bak 2006-05-08 11:19:05.000000000 -0500
+++ pan/gui/header-pane.cc 2006-05-08 11:19:14.000000000 -0500
@@ -90,8 +90,7 @@
const char * pch = (const char*) pan_tree_store_peek_value
(PAN_TREE_STORE(model), iter, COL_COLLATED_AUTHOR);
if (!pch) {
const Article * a (get_article (model, iter));
- const char * in = a->author.empty() ? "" : a->author.c_str();
- char * tmp = do_collate (in);
+ char * tmp = a->author.empty() ? g_strdup("") :
do_collate(a->author.c_str());
pan_tree_store_set (PAN_TREE_STORE(model), iter, COL_COLLATED_AUTHOR,
tmp, -1);
g_free (tmp);
pch = get_collated_author (model, iter);
@@ -105,8 +104,7 @@
const char * pch = (const char*) pan_tree_store_peek_value
(PAN_TREE_STORE(model), iter, COL_COLLATED_SUBJECT);
if (!pch) {
const Article * a (get_article (model, iter));
- const char * in = a->subject.empty() ? "" : a->subject.c_str();
- char * tmp = do_collate (in);
+ char * tmp = a->subject.empty() ? g_strdup("") :
do_collate(a->subject.c_str());
pan_tree_store_set (PAN_TREE_STORE(model), iter, COL_COLLATED_SUBJECT,
tmp, -1);
g_free (tmp);
pch = get_collated_subject (model, iter);
_______________________________________________
Pan-users mailing list
Pan-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users
