Steven Adeff posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below, on Fri, 07 Apr 2006 08:13:21 -0400:
> wait, my news server lets me make 8 connections, so will Pan only make 4 > connections even if I tell it to make more? One of PAN's prime features (and thus a big no-no for change, as far as Charles is concerned, and I agree) has been that it's 100% GNKSA compliant. One of the GNKSA points is that multiple connections be possible, but that the newsreader not abuse them or the server. As defined in GNKSA (and it's a generally observed standard elsewhere as well, so GNKSA is in good company), that means limiting to no more than four connections, to prevent possibly DOSing the server. That said, Charles has on several occasions pointed out the file and function in the source where the 4 connection hard limit is set, and suggested that individual users can change the appropriate line and recompile, if desired. That's what the GPL is all about -- giving the users that right, and PAN wouldn't be GPL if its developers didn't believe in it. Alternatively, one can always set up two separate logical servers within PAN, just pointing them at the same remote news server. Pre 0.9x, that meant separately scheduling downloads on each server, but if I'm reading the 0.9x features correctly, that's no longer necessary. Simply setup the two multiple logical servers within PAN, configure one of them for the mod-4 connections and the others for 4 connections each to get the allowed number of connections, and you should be set. > Also, how "smart" is Pan in this regard. Say I'm downloading some > binaries and decide I want to peruse another group. If I elect to > download headers what will 0.9x do, wait for the binaries to finish or > use a connection percentage to download the headers? "Headers" (really overviews, a subset of headers) normally take one connection per server. (Of course, if you have multiple logical servers setup...) Often, on servers capping connection speeds (keep in mind that more than two connections on servers /not/ capping per connection speed is likely counterproductive, as the computer resources required to track the extra connections aren't free, and neither is context switching between all those connection threads), overview downloads won't be capped as a message download would be. Thus, one connection will often fill the bandwidth of several, for overview downloads. More directly answering your question, PAN's decently smart, even in 0.14.x. It won't interfere with individual message segment downloading, but (from memory, I haven't used the feature in awhile as I use klibido for binaries now, as I mentioned) it queues new tasks at the top (unless you tell it not to, the save-as dialog allows the choice of top or bottom, for instance), so they get processed at the soonest opportunity -- immediately after the first individual segment download completion. In any case, there's the task manager available. If you don't like the queue ordering, open that and switch it. Note that "a connection percentage" distorts the picture. A single connection can be doing only one thing at once. As tasks reach the top of the queue, the first free connection picks them off. Thus, downloading overviews, which occurs in a single connection, will get picked off and executed in one piece. It's possible, however, to queue up a multipart task, put it at the top of the queue, and have all threads switch to it until either the number of parts is exhausted or the number of threads is reached and all of them are working on that task. It's not possible to dedicate a specific percentage of a connection or of connections to a task, other than by controlling the number of individual parts within that task. (Again, using multiple logical servers changes this. If you want 75% of your connections working on one thing and 25% on another, and the real server supports 4 connections, set up one logical server with one connection and another with three, and there you go! Of course, with 8 possible connections, you'd set up one with four, and two with two, then use the 4 and one of the 2 for the 75%, and the other 2 for the 25%.) Again, I'm waiting a bit before I try 0.9x, so I can't answer specifically for it. Barring bugs and possibly incompletely implemented features, the same general process should apply, however, with the exception being that 0.9x can automate more of the multi-server handling, as it's the logical approach. -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman in http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html _______________________________________________ Pan-users mailing list Pan-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users
