Ok so put VLAN 2 as the registration VLAN in your switch configuration under 
Configuration > Policies and Access Control > Switches > Switch IP > Roles > 
Registration -> 2

Thanks,

Ludovic Zammit
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ::  +1.514.447.4918 (x145) ::  
www.inverse.ca <https://www.inverse.ca/>
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu <http://www.sogo.nu/>) 
and PacketFence (http://packetfence.org <http://packetfence.org/>)







> On Apr 8, 2021, at 9:48 AM, Heusler Marie-Cécile 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Not really. I just want that devices who don't match with my AD source go to 
> the VLAN2 and can do nothing.
> 
> 
> De : Ludovic Zammit <[email protected]>
> Envoyé : jeudi, 8 avril 2021 15:29
> À : Heusler Marie-Cécile
> Cc : [email protected]
> Objet : Re: VLAN for rejected machine
>  
> Is this the registration VLAN ?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ludovic Zammit
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ::  +1.514.447.4918 (x145) ::  
> www.inverse.ca <https://www.inverse.ca/>
> Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu 
> <http://www.sogo.nu/>) and PacketFence (http://packetfence.org 
> <http://packetfence.org/>)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On Apr 8, 2021, at 8:12 AM, Heusler Marie-Cécile 
>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> For the time being, VLAN2 simply serves as an isolation VLAN. The 
>> workstations should not access anything from this VLAN. 
>> 
>> 
>> De : Ludovic Zammit <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>> Envoyé : jeudi, 8 avril 2021 13:33
>> À : Heusler Marie-Cécile
>> Cc : [email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>> Objet : Re: VLAN for rejected machine
>>  
>> What’s the VLAN 2 and his purpose?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Ludovic Zammit
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ::  +1.514.447.4918 (x145) :: 
>>  www.inverse.ca <https://www.inverse.ca/>
>> Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu 
>> <http://www.sogo.nu/>) and PacketFence (http://packetfence.org 
>> <http://packetfence.org/>)
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Apr 8, 2021, at 1:38 AM, Heusler Marie-Cécile 
>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> The devices are, for example, laptops that are not part of the domain. I 
>>> want them to enter VLAN2, but I don't know them in advance.
>>> 
>>> Where do I specify that I want them to be in VLAN2, without their login 
>>> failing with my AD source? 
>>> 
>>> What I've tried to do so far is to create a second Authorization source, 
>>> and a new profile that uses that source. I don't know if this is correct.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> <pastedImage.png>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> <pastedImage.png>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Thanks
>>> De : Ludovic Zammit <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>> Envoyé : mercredi, 7 avril 2021 13:53:40
>>> À : Heusler Marie-Cécile
>>> Cc : [email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> Objet : Re: VLAN for rejected machine
>>>  
>>> With Mac authentication, you will need to pre-import your Mac address if 
>>> you know them, create a VLAN filter that automatically a MAC OUI for 
>>> example or you redirect the on the captive portal to give them an option to 
>>> register themselves.
>>> 
>>> In your case, if you don’t know them, you return a VLAN 2 (don’t forget to 
>>> return VLAN 2 in the registration role in the switch configuration) and 
>>> they will never get a role and registered. They will end up having access 
>>> on VLAN 2.
>>> 
>>> What are those devices ?
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> 
>>> Ludovic Zammit
>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ::  +1.514.447.4918 (x145) 
>>> ::  www.inverse.ca <https://www.inverse.ca/>
>>> Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu 
>>> <http://www.sogo.nu/>) and PacketFence (http://packetfence.org 
>>> <http://packetfence.org/>)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Apr 7, 2021, at 1:25 AM, Heusler Marie-Cécile 
>>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Ok, I enabled mac authentication, but now here are my radius logs once I 
>>>> connect the node to the switch:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Apr 7 07:19:51 TPI-PF1 auth[1944]: Adding client 192.168.137.200/32
>>>> Apr 7 07:19:51 TPI-PF1 auth[1944]: [mac:98:e7:f4:14:44:f0] Accepted user: 
>>>> and returned VLAN
>>>> Apr 7 07:19:51 TPI-PF1 auth[1944]: (3879) Login OK: [98e7f41444f0] (from 
>>>> client 192.168.137.200/32 port 19 cli 98:e7:f4:14:44:f0)
>>>> 
>>>> Apr 7 07:19:51 TPI-PF1 packetfence_httpd.aaa: httpd.aaa(1218) INFO: 
>>>> [mac:98:e7:f4:14:44:f0] handling radius autz request: from switch_ip => 
>>>> (192.168.137.200), connection_type => Ethernet-NoEAP,switch_mac => 
>>>> (00:16:b9:0b:37:0d), mac => [98:e7:f4:14:44:f0], port => 19, username => 
>>>> "98e7f41444f0" (pf::radius::authorize)
>>>> Apr 7 07:19:51 TPI-PF1 packetfence_httpd.aaa: httpd.aaa(1218) INFO: 
>>>> [mac:98:e7:f4:14:44:f0] Instantiate profile default 
>>>> (pf::Connection::ProfileFactory::_from_profile)
>>>> Apr 7 07:19:51 TPI-PF1 packetfence_httpd.aaa: httpd.aaa(1218) INFO: 
>>>> [mac:98:e7:f4:14:44:f0] Match rule Email-on-role (pf::access_filter::test)
>>>> Apr 7 07:19:51 TPI-PF1 packetfence_httpd.aaa: httpd.aaa(1218) INFO: 
>>>> [mac:98:e7:f4:14:44:f0] Found authentication source(s) : 
>>>> 'local,file1,MonDomaine' for realm 'null' 
>>>> (pf::config::util::filter_authentication_sources)
>>>> Apr 7 07:19:51 TPI-PF1 packetfence_httpd.aaa: httpd.aaa(1218) WARN: 
>>>> [mac:98:e7:f4:14:44:f0] No category computed for autoreg 
>>>> (pf::role::getNodeInfoForAutoReg)
>>>> Apr 7 07:19:51 TPI-PF1 packetfence_httpd.aaa: httpd.aaa(1218) INFO: 
>>>> [mac:98:e7:f4:14:44:f0] Match rule Email-on-role (pf::access_filter::test)
>>>> Apr 7 07:19:51 TPI-PF1 packetfence_httpd.webservices: 
>>>> httpd.webservices(1790) WARN: [mac:98:e7:f4:14:44:f0] Unable to pull 
>>>> accounting history for device 98:e7:f4:14:44:f0. The history set doesn't 
>>>> exist yet. (pf::accounting_events_history::latest_mac_history)
>>>> Apr 7 07:19:51 TPI-PF1 packetfence_httpd.aaa: httpd.aaa(1218) INFO: 
>>>> [mac:98:e7:f4:14:44:f0] Found authentication source(s) : 
>>>> 'local,file1,MonDomaine' for realm 'null' 
>>>> (pf::config::util::filter_authentication_sources)
>>>> Apr 7 07:19:51 TPI-PF1 packetfence_httpd.aaa: httpd.aaa(1218) INFO: 
>>>> [mac:98:e7:f4:14:44:f0] Connection type is MAC-AUTH. Getting role from 
>>>> node_info (pf::role::getRegisteredRole)
>>>> Apr 7 07:19:51 TPI-PF1 packetfence_httpd.aaa: httpd.aaa(1218) WARN: 
>>>> [mac:98:e7:f4:14:44:f0] Use of uninitialized value $role in concatenation 
>>>> (.) or string at /usr/local/pf/lib/pf/role.pm line 489.
>>>> (pf::role::getRegisteredRole)
>>>> Apr 7 07:19:51 TPI-PF1 packetfence_httpd.aaa: httpd.aaa(1218) INFO: 
>>>> [mac:98:e7:f4:14:44:f0] Username was NOT defined or unable to match a role 
>>>> - returning node based role '' (pf::role::getRegisteredRole)
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> I tried to create a new connection profile, but the result is the same.
>>>> 
>>>> Any ideas?
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>  
>>>> De : Ludovic Zammit <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>>> Envoyé : mardi, 6 avril 2021 19:48
>>>> À : Heusler Marie-Cécile
>>>> Cc : [email protected] 
>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>> Objet : Re: VLAN for rejected machine
>>>>  
>>>> You can’t because if those not joined machines connect over 802.1x they 
>>>> will fail and stay there.
>>>> 
>>>> What you want to do is 802.1x + Mac authentication bypass (MAB) on the 
>>>> switch port.
>>>> 
>>>> A none corporate machine should do MAB and land on the captive portal and 
>>>> authenticate. If you want to skip that part, you can put VLAN ID 2 in the 
>>>> registration role on the switch so everyone that do Mac authentication 
>>>> would be redirected on VLAN 2.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> 
>>>> Ludovic Zammit
>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ::  +1.514.447.4918 (x145) 
>>>> ::  www.inverse.ca <https://www.inverse.ca/>
>>>> Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu 
>>>> <http://www.sogo.nu/>) and PacketFence (http://packetfence.org 
>>>> <http://packetfence.org/>)
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On Apr 6, 2021, at 1:33 PM, Heusler Marie-Cécile 
>>>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hello
>>>>> 
>>>>> I have an authentication source that gives the role VLAN1 to the 
>>>>> corporate machines.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> <pastedImage.png>
>>>>> 
>>>>> <pastedImage.png>
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Now I want to give to the non-corporate machines the role VLAN2. However, 
>>>>> I can't assign a role to a node that can't login to the source.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Adding client 10.104.92.130/32
>>>>> Apr 6 19:11:06 packetfence auth[19459]: (195) chrooted_mschap_machine: 
>>>>> ERROR: Program returned code (1) and output 'Logon failure (0xc000006d)'
>>>>> Apr 6 19:11:06 packetfence auth[19459]: (195) Login incorrect 
>>>>> (chrooted_mschap_machine: Program returned code (1) and output 'Logon 
>>>>> failure (0xc000006d)'): [host/client.tpi.local] (from client 
>>>>> 10.104.92.130/32 port 21 cli 2c:44:fd:65:ab:27 via TLS tunnel)
>>>>> Apr 6 19:11:06 packetfence auth[19459]: [mac:2c:44:fd:65:ab:27] Rejected 
>>>>> user: host/client.tpi.local
>>>>> Apr 6 19:11:06 packetfence auth[19459]: (196) Login incorrect (eap_peap: 
>>>>> The users session was previously rejected: returning reject (again.)): 
>>>>> [host/client.tpi.local] (from client 10.104.92.130/32 port 21 cli 
>>>>> 2c:44:fd:65:ab:27)
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> A client that are not in the domain will have a login incorrect. But how 
>>>>> can I say that every client out of the domain will move to the VLAN2 role 
>>>>> ?
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thank you for your reply.

_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
  • [PacketFence-users] VLAN for r... Heusler Marie-Cécile via PacketFence-users
    • Re: [PacketFence-users] V... Ludovic Zammit via PacketFence-users
      • Re: [PacketFence-user... Heusler Marie-Cécile via PacketFence-users
        • Re: [PacketFence-... Ludovic Zammit via PacketFence-users
          • Re: [PacketFe... Heusler Marie-Cécile via PacketFence-users
            • Re: [Pac... Ludovic Zammit via PacketFence-users
              • Re: ... Heusler Marie-Cécile via PacketFence-users
                • ... Ludovic Zammit via PacketFence-users
                • ... Heusler Marie-Cécile via PacketFence-users
                • ... Ludovic Zammit via PacketFence-users
                • ... Heusler Marie-Cécile via PacketFence-users
                • ... Ludovic Zammit via PacketFence-users
                • ... Heusler Marie-Cécile via PacketFence-users
                • ... Ludovic Zammit via PacketFence-users
                • ... Heusler Marie-Cécile via PacketFence-users
                • ... Ludovic Zammit via PacketFence-users
                • ... Ludovic Zammit via PacketFence-users
                • ... Heusler Marie-Cécile via PacketFence-users
                • ... Ludovic Zammit via PacketFence-users

Reply via email to