https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2464809
--- Comment #3 from Georg Sauthoff <[email protected]> --- Ok, good point, I've added the alternatives link with a %ghost directive. Yes, it makes sense to upstream the patch. I already reported the issue the patch addresses to the author, via email, last weekend, but I haven't received a reply, so far. However, I think there isn't really a way around such a change for fixing the SONAME, if you want to use the library as documented by the author: > The idea is that the OS can install librandombytes-kernel by default, but the > sysadmin can install librandombytes-openssl to transparently switch all of > the randombytes() applications to RAND_bytes (for example, via Debian's > /etc/alternatives mechanism) if profiling shows that this switch is important > for overall system performance. (https://randombytes.cr.yp.to/index.html) Spec URL: https://codeberg.org/gms/fedora-pkg-submission/raw/commit/7ef2a4a4c3437c4426dbf83e2680763946d3ef83/librandombytes.spec Diff: https://codeberg.org/gms/fedora-pkg-submission/commit/7ef2a4a4c3437c4426dbf83e2680763946d3ef83 SRPM URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~gsauthof/librandombytes-20240318-1.fc43.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2464809 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202464809%23c3 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
