https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2452892
--- Comment #12 from Phil Wyett <[email protected]> --- > > SPEC file > > ========= > > > > The large amount of file licensing explaination maybe could be moved to a > > seperate file with reference to that file in the spec file. > > Do you have an example of how to do this right? I also am annoyed with them > (finding and having them in the spec). For me, I would remove the data from the spec file and put it in a file, say 'extended_license_info.txt'. Under the 'License' block in the spec file, I would add similar to below. # For extended information on the packages licenses, see 'extended_license_info.txt' in the repo root. I would import the rpm after creating the repo and after then commit/push 'extended_license_info.txt' to the repo. Regards Phil -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2452892 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202452892%23c12 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
