https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2450187
[email protected] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?([email protected]) | --- Comment #13 from [email protected] --- I switched to InclusiveArch. The spec link is still good, build is running. You can re-run the build now. i386 is not a useful inclusion, but aarch64, pc64le, and s390x may be worth trying to get working for CI or CAD file management applications. pc64le fails for the same self-test errors as aarch64. What could have caused s390x to take so much longer? In any case, current scope is just for x86_64. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2450187 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202450187%23c13 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
