https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2458075
--- Comment #4 from Richard W.M. Jones <[email protected]> --- Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: ======= - If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang. Note: No gcc, gcc-c++ or clang found in BuildRequires See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/C_and_C++/ RWMJ: There is no C or C++ code directly found. The OCaml compiler will run GCC, but the compiler ought to pull that in via a dependency. So I don't understand the issue here, I think it's a false positive. ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [ ]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. RWMJ: This section seems irrelevant, see above. Generic: [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. Note: Using prebuilt packages [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. RWMJ: A lot of AI-generated code, but hey. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* GNU Affero General Public License", "*No copyright* GNU Affero General Public License v3.0", "GNU Affero General Public License v3.0", "*No copyright* GNU Affero General Public License v3.0 [generated file]", "BSD 3-Clause License", "ISC License", "MIT License". 437 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /var/lib/copr- rpmbuild/results/ocaml-yamlx/licensecheck.txt RWMJ: The intention is obviously that the code in total is licensed under AGPL. License notices on individual files are missing in most cases, but the intention is still clear. [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. RWMJ: Uses dune which should honour the flags. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries or specifies bundled libraries with Provides: bundled(<libname>) if unbundling is not possible. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. RWMJ: Uses autochangelog [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [-]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 11036 bytes in 2 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Ocaml: [x]: This should never happen ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. RWMJ: I rebuilt it in mock. [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [-]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. RWMJ: Latest is 0.1.0, same as packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify is not used. RWMJ: No signature that I can find. [-]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [-]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s). Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. Rpmlint ------- Checking: ocaml-yamlx-0.1.0-1.fc45.x86_64.rpm ocaml-yamlx-devel-0.1.0-1.fc45.x86_64.rpm ocaml-yamlx-0.1.0-1.fc45.src.rpm ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.8.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmp5zsdsajp')] checks: 32, packages: 3 ocaml-yamlx.src: E: spelling-error ('exn', '%description -l en_US exn -> ex, en, exon') ocaml-yamlx.src: E: spelling-error ('pos', '%description -l en_US pos -> pews, ops, sop') ocaml-yamlx.src: E: spelling-error ('stdin', '%description -l en_US stdin -> stein, stain, stdio') ocaml-yamlx.x86_64: E: spelling-error ('exn', '%description -l en_US exn -> ex, en, exon') ocaml-yamlx.x86_64: E: spelling-error ('pos', '%description -l en_US pos -> pews, ops, sop') ocaml-yamlx.x86_64: E: spelling-error ('stdin', '%description -l en_US stdin -> stein, stain, stdio') RWMJ: These are fine. ocaml-yamlx.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary yamlx RWMJ: It would be nice, but there isn't one upstream ocaml-yamlx-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation RWMJ: Docs are in *.mli files & online. 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 6 errors, 2 warnings, 11 filtered, 6 badness; has taken 0.7 s Rpmlint (debuginfo) ------------------- Checking: ocaml-yamlx-debuginfo-0.1.0-1.fc45.x86_64.rpm ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.8.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmp_2ykh3mf')] checks: 32, packages: 1 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 11 filtered, 0 badness; has taken 0.2 s Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- (none): E: there is no installed rpm "ocaml-yamlx-debuginfo". (none): E: there is no installed rpm "ocaml-yamlx". ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.9.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml checks: 32, packages: 3 0 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 filtered, 0 badness; has taken 0.0 s (none): E: there is no installed rpm "ocaml-yamlx-devel". There are no files to process nor additional arguments. Nothing to do, aborting. Source checksums ---------------- https://github.com/mjambon/yamlx/archive/0.1.0/yamlx-0.1.0.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 91b06a9c96d6dc32cdbc849343ef605a39e82888ddb5249af96ef1ec8215f854 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 91b06a9c96d6dc32cdbc849343ef605a39e82888ddb5249af96ef1ec8215f854 Requires -------- ocaml-yamlx (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): glibc libc.so.6()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) ocaml(CamlinternalFormatBasics) ocaml(CamlinternalLazy) ocaml(Ppx_deriving_runtime) ocaml(Stdlib) ocaml(Stdlib__Array) ocaml(Stdlib__Bool) ocaml(Stdlib__Buffer) ocaml(Stdlib__Bytes) ocaml(Stdlib__Char) ocaml(Stdlib__Domain) ocaml(Stdlib__Either) ocaml(Stdlib__Float) ocaml(Stdlib__Format) ocaml(Stdlib__Fun) ocaml(Stdlib__Hashtbl) ocaml(Stdlib__Int32) ocaml(Stdlib__Int64) ocaml(Stdlib__Lazy) ocaml(Stdlib__List) ocaml(Stdlib__Obj) ocaml(Stdlib__Option) ocaml(Stdlib__Printexc) ocaml(Stdlib__Printf) ocaml(Stdlib__Queue) ocaml(Stdlib__Result) ocaml(Stdlib__Seq) ocaml(Stdlib__Set) ocaml(Stdlib__String) ocaml(Stdlib__Uchar) ocaml(YAMLx__) ocaml(YAMLx__Char_class) ocaml(YAMLx__Comment_attacher) ocaml(YAMLx__Composer) ocaml(YAMLx__Event_printer) ocaml(YAMLx__List_ext) ocaml(YAMLx__Parser) ocaml(YAMLx__Printer) ocaml(YAMLx__Reader) ocaml(YAMLx__Resolver) ocaml(YAMLx__Scanner) ocaml(YAMLx__Types) rtld(GNU_HASH) ocaml-yamlx-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): ocaml(CamlinternalFormatBasics) ocaml(CamlinternalLazy) ocaml(Ppx_deriving_runtime) ocaml(Stdlib) ocaml(Stdlib__Array) ocaml(Stdlib__Bool) ocaml(Stdlib__Buffer) ocaml(Stdlib__Bytes) ocaml(Stdlib__Char) ocaml(Stdlib__Domain) ocaml(Stdlib__Either) ocaml(Stdlib__Float) ocaml(Stdlib__Format) ocaml(Stdlib__Fun) ocaml(Stdlib__Hashtbl) ocaml(Stdlib__Int32) ocaml(Stdlib__Int64) ocaml(Stdlib__Lazy) ocaml(Stdlib__List) ocaml(Stdlib__Obj) ocaml(Stdlib__Option) ocaml(Stdlib__Printexc) ocaml(Stdlib__Printf) ocaml(Stdlib__Queue) ocaml(Stdlib__Result) ocaml(Stdlib__Seq) ocaml(Stdlib__Set) ocaml(Stdlib__String) ocaml(Stdlib__Uchar) ocaml(YAMLx__) ocaml(YAMLx__Char_class) ocaml(YAMLx__Comment_attacher) ocaml(YAMLx__Composer) ocaml(YAMLx__Event_printer) ocaml(YAMLx__List_ext) ocaml(YAMLx__Parser) ocaml(YAMLx__Printer) ocaml(YAMLx__Reader) ocaml(YAMLx__Resolver) ocaml(YAMLx__Scanner) ocaml(YAMLx__Types) ocaml-yamlx(x86-64) ocamlx(CamlinternalFormat) ocamlx(CamlinternalLazy) ocamlx(Stdlib) ocamlx(Stdlib__Array) ocamlx(Stdlib__Atomic) ocamlx(Stdlib__Bool) ocamlx(Stdlib__Buffer) ocamlx(Stdlib__Bytes) ocamlx(Stdlib__Char) ocamlx(Stdlib__Domain) ocamlx(Stdlib__Float) ocamlx(Stdlib__Format) ocamlx(Stdlib__Fun) ocamlx(Stdlib__Hashtbl) ocamlx(Stdlib__Int64) ocamlx(Stdlib__Lazy) ocamlx(Stdlib__List) ocamlx(Stdlib__Option) ocamlx(Stdlib__Printexc) ocamlx(Stdlib__Printf) ocamlx(Stdlib__Queue) ocamlx(Stdlib__Random) ocamlx(Stdlib__Seq) ocamlx(Stdlib__Set) ocamlx(Stdlib__String) ocamlx(YAMLx__Char_class) ocamlx(YAMLx__Comment_attacher) ocamlx(YAMLx__Composer) ocamlx(YAMLx__Event_printer) ocamlx(YAMLx__List_ext) ocamlx(YAMLx__Parser) ocamlx(YAMLx__Printer) ocamlx(YAMLx__Reader) ocamlx(YAMLx__Resolver) ocamlx(YAMLx__Scanner) ocamlx(YAMLx__Types) Provides -------- ocaml-yamlx: ocaml(YAMLx) ocaml(YAMLx__) ocaml(YAMLx__Char_class) ocaml(YAMLx__Comment_attacher) ocaml(YAMLx__Composer) ocaml(YAMLx__Event_printer) ocaml(YAMLx__List_ext) ocaml(YAMLx__Parser) ocaml(YAMLx__Printer) ocaml(YAMLx__Reader) ocaml(YAMLx__Resolver) ocaml(YAMLx__Scanner) ocaml(YAMLx__Types) ocaml-yamlx ocaml-yamlx(x86-64) ocaml-yamlx-devel: ocaml(YAMLx) ocaml(YAMLx__) ocaml(YAMLx__Char_class) ocaml(YAMLx__Comment_attacher) ocaml(YAMLx__Composer) ocaml(YAMLx__Event_printer) ocaml(YAMLx__List_ext) ocaml(YAMLx__Parser) ocaml(YAMLx__Printer) ocaml(YAMLx__Reader) ocaml(YAMLx__Resolver) ocaml(YAMLx__Scanner) ocaml(YAMLx__Types) ocaml-yamlx-devel ocaml-yamlx-devel(x86-64) ocamlx(YAMLx) ocamlx(YAMLx__) ocamlx(YAMLx__Char_class) ocamlx(YAMLx__Comment_attacher) ocamlx(YAMLx__Composer) ocamlx(YAMLx__Event_printer) ocamlx(YAMLx__List_ext) ocamlx(YAMLx__Parser) ocamlx(YAMLx__Printer) ocamlx(YAMLx__Reader) ocamlx(YAMLx__Resolver) ocamlx(YAMLx__Scanner) ocamlx(YAMLx__Types) RWMJ: Requires/provides look fine. Generated by fedora-review 0.11.0 (05c5b26) last change: 2025-11-29 Command line :/bin/fedora-review --no-colors --prebuilt --rpm-spec --name ocaml-yamlx --mock-config /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/configs/child.cfg Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Ocaml, C/C++, Shell-api, Generic Disabled plugins: Perl, SugarActivity, fonts, Haskell, Java, Python, R, PHP Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2458075 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202458075%23c4 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
