https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2279244
--- Comment #46 from Phil Wyett <[email protected]> --- Hi, In this episode I am looking at the 'basalt-headers' primarily. The modified 'image.h' from Pangolin still falls under the MIT license? With also the 'Sophus' archive, should we have the 'License' element in the spec file be 'AND MIT'? License: BSD-3-Clause AND MIT Thoughts? Regards Phil -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2279244 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202279244%23c46 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
