https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2445610
--- Comment #8 from [email protected] <[email protected]> --- Thanks for the extra details. All implemented apart from the "simpler approach" to the %files for the data package. I had some problems with it, but rather than spend more time, you said it was fine, and it does work as is! https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/peterbb/c-evo-dh/build/10209872/ Regarding the %{gpgverify} step. This broke builds on Mageia and older versions of Fedora as the gpgverify package does not seem to be available there. Is there a simple way of making this check conditional on the presence of gpgverify, to restore those builds? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2445610 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202445610%23c8 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
