https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2443772
Fabio Valentini <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #12 from Fabio Valentini <[email protected]> --- > OK, looks like GPLv3/AGPLv3 in the tarball, and the License field is correct. Not really. It only accounts for the sources of ripgrep-edit itself, not for statically linked Rust dependencies. From the build.log: ### BEGIN LICENSE SUMMARY ### # Apache-2.0 OR MIT # Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception OR Apache-2.0 OR MIT # GPL-3.0-or-later OR AGPL-3.0-or-later # MIT # MIT OR Apache-2.0 ### END LICENSE SUMMARY ### I would also have recommended to use the new / updated Rust package templates, i.e. https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Rust/#_non_crate_rust_project and not using an old version of rust2rpm. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2443772 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202443772%23c12 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
