https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2428704

Fabio Valentini <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |POST
              Flags|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+



--- Comment #29 from Fabio Valentini <[email protected]> ---
Thanks, did another full review pass over the spec file, and I think everything
looks as good as it can now.

As mentioned on Matrix, changing "BR: clang-devel" to "BR: clang" for the
vendored libsqlite3-sys does not look correct.
If the clang dependency is there because of bindgen usage, then it can just be
"clang-libs".
The lint from fedora-review about missing gcc/gcc-c++/clang is for C/C++
packages, which this one isn't -
I suppose the lint got triggered by the presence of some .c or .h files in
vendor/.

Also, to make the conflict with the "golang-github-pressly-goose" package
explicit,
please add "Conflicts: golang-github-pressly-goose" to the spec file.

As far as I can tell, all issues from the last review pass were addressed,
and I see no new issues in the latest version.

I'm not posting the full output / review checklist template of fedora-review
here,
since basically all ground has already been covered in the comments above.

As far as I can tell, package is now compliant with generic and Rust-specific
Packaging Guidelines, so
the package is **APPROVED**, but please address the two minor things above
before building the package.

I hope that the feature that pulls in deno / swc can be made optional upstream
soon,
otherwise you're going to be stuck at 1.23.2 for a while :(


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2428704

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202428704%23c29

-- 
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new

Reply via email to