On 2014-07-17T10:36:01, Nick Cameo <[email protected]> wrote:
> "Instead, have the HA hypervisor layer protect the VM as a clustered
> service"
>
> I had to read this a couple of times Lars, and it's interesting. If I
> understand correctly run the cluster on bare metal, taking care of the
> virtual machine instances on the same box?
Yes, exactly. In my opinion, any hypervisor environment should support
HA/fail-over protection for the guests it manages.
This can be done easily with corosync/pacemaker and, say, using the
VirtualDomain or Xen resource agents.
Regards,
Lars
--
Architect Storage/HA
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB
21284 (AG Nürnberg)
"Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde
_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list: [email protected]
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
