On 2013-12-14T01:11:17, Vladislav Bogdanov <[email protected]> wrote:
> > The idea was to offer an additional construct that provides both
> > properties, since *most of the time*, that's what users want. In the
> > interest of clarity and brevity in the configuration, this would be
> > quite useful.
> group?
groups can't be used with resource sets, template resources, resources
can only be in one group, they don't support roles, mix badly between
primitive/clone/m/s resources, they aggregate resources into a container
object, etc.
It's not the same as a "proper" constraint, even if indeed groups are
also a form of shorthand.
Regards,
Lars
--
Architect Storage/HA
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB
21284 (AG Nürnberg)
"Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde
_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list: [email protected]
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
