Hi Lars, thank you for your answer. I'm not sure, why you think, that p_conntrackd should be started before my interface eth0. I like the idea of linking p_openvpn1 + 2 to cluster1. That should work and I will instantly give it a try.
Stefan -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Lars Marowsky-Bree [mailto:[email protected]] This colocation is redundant, since the group already implies it. True. That's not what you want. Also, your colocations are the wrong way around (you want to place p_conntrackd where p_eth0 is, not the other way around). The easiest way is to split them into separate colocations: colocation c-1 inf: p_openvpn1 cluster1 colocation c-2 inf: p_openvpn2 cluster1 _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: [email protected] http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
