You created bug 2003 for this right? Or is this another case? On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 19:49, Adrian Chapela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dominik Klein escribió: >> >> Adrian Chapela wrote: >>> >>> Dominik Klein escribió: >>>>> >>>>> What are you saying me ? I should have another communication channel as >>>>> a COM port... I could test this with a null modem cable. >>>> >>>> You need at least 2 connections between the nodes. It never was >>>> different. >>>> >>>> It once was true that a null modem oder serial cable as the second >>>> connection was enough - from my _personal_ experience, having 2 ethernet >>>> connections is better (because faster and able to cope with the rather high >>>> traffic of v2 (pacemaker)). >>> >>> I tested two options. I think the best option is a second ethernet card. >>> I have configured this option but I saw that my cluster didn't do a >>> failover. >>> The two connections are in different networks (One in 192.168.18.X and >>> other in 172.16.1.0) but I don't know why pingd isn't going down all of >>> resources. >>> >>> I have this connectivity constraint: >>> <rsc_location id="mail-connectivity" rsc="Mail-drbd"> >>> <rule id="mail-pingd-prefer-rule" score="-INFINITY" >>> role="Master"> >>> <expression id="mail-pingd-prefer" >>> attribute="pingd" operation="lt" value="1000"/> >>> </rule> >>> </rsc_location> >>> >>> >>> >>> <rsc_location id="samba-connectivity" rsc="Samba-drbd"> >>> <rule id="samba-pingd-exclude-rule" score="-INFINITY" > >>> <expression id="samba-pingd-exclude" >>> attribute="pingd" operation="lt" value="1000"/> >>> </rule> >>> </rsc_location> >>> >>> And this colocation: >>> <rsc_colocation id="mail_drbrd_rule" rsc="Mail" with-rsc="Mail-drbd" >>> with-rsc-role="Master" score="INFINITY"/> >>> <rsc_colocation id="samba_drbrd_rule" rsc="Samba" with-rsc="Samba-drbd" >>> with-rsc-role="Master" score="INFINITY"/> >>> >>> The node lost connectivity with 192.168.18.0 (I defined all host in this >>> network for pingd) and pingd value should be less than 1000. >> >> Should be or is? > > It could be a problem with pingd again, I couldn't see pingd updating the > value. > I have attached hb_report. >> >> Could you post your xml including the status section in this situation? > >> >> Regards >> Dominik >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pacemaker mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://list.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Pacemaker mailing list > [email protected] > http://list.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker > >
_______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list [email protected] http://list.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
