On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 08:17, Junko IKEDA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> Or is the upgrading to Pacemaker only recommended way? >> > >> > We won't be backporting anything short of extremly critical fixes >> > (such >> > as security issues) to 2.1.x at this time, as 2.99.x+pacemaker is a >> > 1:1 >> > replacement. >> > >> > (That is true for the community releases; if necessary, SLE10 SP2 >> > customers will get updates via support+maintenance. But since we'd >> > rather not work on 2.1.x any more, we only do this if bribed ;-) >> >> a LOT :-) > > Ok, we have to think about upgrading. > There is no money for influencing you by bribery. Oh we weren't being serious - if a customer finds a bug/regression in a supported version, then we need to fix it. No bribes are required. This is the benefit of being a customer - you don't even need to worry about this because regardless of what happens to clustering "upstream", we're paid to maintain the "old" version for 7 years after it's release. Besides, beer and pizza are more effective for bribes anyway :-) _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list [email protected] http://list.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
