On 2008-09-13T22:57:03, Lars Ellenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > There were _reasons_ why I insisted that drbd8 doesn't work with
> > pacemarker yet. ;-)
>
> why not?
> it does work fine.
Not really. The RA doesn't know about "outdated" for example and would
still flag that node as eligible for promotion.
> you just have to skip the "floating peer" nonsense^Wstuff.
No; in fact, I think you have to skip the m/s approach and use drbddisk
instead, and also forego monitoring of the secondary.
Regards,
Lars
--
Teamlead Kernel, SuSE Labs, Research and Development
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
"Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde
_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
