2008/9/9 Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Sep 9, 2008, at 10:02 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: > >> On 2008-09-09T21:45:30, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> I agree. I think we're talking about a global state here. >> >> Works for me ;-)
But. If there are 2 completely irrelevant resources, Ra & Rb. It'll be very reasonable that the customer want to upgrade Rb while letting pacemaker still monitoring Ra. What's best practice to do so then ? > > so who's adding the feature request to bugzilla? :) > I will, once the whole thing is clear to me :P > _______________________________________________ > Pacemaker mailing list > [email protected] > http://list.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker > _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list [email protected] http://list.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
