Daniel, You're a big name in the Java community. If you emailed [EMAIL PROTECTED] do you think there's any chance they'd consider changing this? I doubt it, especially this late in the process. But maybe they'd consider your comment for a post 2.4.
Thanks for bringing this to light. > -----Original Message----- > From: Daniel F. Savarese [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 11:33 AM > To: ORO Users List > Subject: Re: ORO version conflicts > > > > In message > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Jero > me Jacobsen" writes: > >isn't is a surprise and a big disapointment to me too. Man they > better make > >this required in the next spec version. In the meantime I'll > try and avoid > > I just downloaded the Servlet 2.4 proposed final draft and the wording of > section 9.7.2 is exactly the same as in 2.3 :( > > daniel > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
