Daniel, thanks for the quick fix. Works for me.
Regards Victor > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > writes: > >Why is the 4th line: "4: null" and not "4: C" as I would have expected? > > You have managed to identify a bug of the very worst kind that has been > hiding in the code for much too long. I just fixed it (deleted 3 > characters > and added 2; it's amazing what a great effect so little code can have). > You can check out the latest source from CVS and compile it to get the > fix. I want to get a start on a decent battery of tests before proposing > a vote for a next release. Although visual inspection of the code makes > it pretty clear my change shouldn't break anything else, I don't think > we can get by much longer without decent regression tests. I'll dig > through my archives to see if I can find the old OROMatcher tests and > adapt/update them. > > daniel > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
