Hi Chongfeng,



Thank you for your valuable feedback. My response is as follows.


1. RFC7011 does indeed define the traffic flow as the observation object. In 
our draft, we compare the prefix and AS information carried in BGP Updates 
against the local RPKI VRP cache to obtain the validation state, which is then 
made available to the IPFIX collector. We think we focus on valid BGP routes, 
which correspond to the traffic flows derived from those routes. The BGP POV 
validation state exported in this draft can serve as a route validity attribute 
for the corresponding BGP flows. As an operator, I think this can offer better 
visibility into the security of in-network traffic, helping to prevent route 
leaks or hijacks.


2. The currently referenced ID 294 is indeed based on the validation field 
defined in RFC 8097. We have already adopted the suggestions from Jeff on the 
mailing list (a revised version will be submitted after this Sunday), and are 
incorporating considerations from RFC 8893 (which enhances RFC 6811). Our focus 
is on the local validation result between BGP POV and RPKI, which addresses a 
different scope than ID 294. We also would greatly appreciate further input 
from the working group for this question.




Best Regards

Yisong

 ----邮件原文----发件人:Chongfeng Xie <[email protected]>收件人:Yisong Liu 
<[email protected]>,opsawg  <[email protected]>抄 送: (无)发送时间:2026-03-12 
10:19:00主题:Re: [OPSAWG]Fw:New Version Notification for 
draft-liu-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-pov-00.txtHi Yisong and other co-authors,
I have given a review to your draft and have the following questions,
1)  As you mentioned, this draft defines a new IPFIX Information Element 
specifically for monitoring RPKI-based BGP Prefix Origin Validation states. 
Since IPFIX is used to transmit Traffic Flow  information from an Exporting 
Process to a Collecting Process [RFC7011], so I39d like to know the approach 
you defined is related to " traffic flow"? If yes, how to define the "traffic 
flow" in this case?
2)  For the purpose you mentioned,  why not use the existing “IPFIX Information 
Element bgpValidityState (Element ID 294, see IANA-IPFIX),"?  The 
bgpValidityState IE is used to describe the "validity state" of the BGP route 
correspondent source or destination IP address.  What I mean is that PRKI 
provides the result of BGP Prefix Origin Validation,then the result is carried 
in bgpValidityState IE for transmission,  Is there any problems?
Best regards
Chongfeng



From: Yisong Liu
Date: 2026-02-12 17:18
To: opsawg
CC: draft-liu-opsawg-ipf
Subject: [OPSAWG]Fw:New Version Notification for 
draft-liu-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-pov-00.txt




Dear WG,

This draft defines a new IPFIX Information Element specifically for monitoring 
RPKI-based BGP Prefix Origin Validation states (valid, invalid, not-found). 
Currently, operators lack standardized ways to collect and observe these 
critical route validation states across their networks. Our proposal fills this 
gap, enabling better visibility into potential route hijacking and enhancing 
network security observability.



We believe this work would greatly benefit from the working group39s collective 
expertise.We would sincerely appreciate your review comments and feedback on 
the draft. Your insights will be invaluable in helping us refine the technical 
details and strengthen the proposal for the next revision.



Thank you very much for your time and consideration.


Best Regards,Yisong Liu





----邮件原文----发件人:internet-drafts <[email protected]>收件人:Taoran Zhou 
<[email protected]>,Xueyan Song <[email protected]>,Yisong Liu 
<[email protected]>抄 送: (无)发送时间:2026-02-11 14:12:36主题:New Version 
Notification for draft-liu-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-pov-00.txtA new version of 
Internet-Draft draft-liu-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-pov-00.txt has beensuccessfully 
submitted by Yisong Liu and posted to theIETF repository.Name:     
draft-liu-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-povRevision: 00Title:    Export of BGP Prefix Origin 
Validation in IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)Date:     2026-02-10Group:    
Individual SubmissionPages:    8URL:      
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-liu-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-pov-00.txtStatus:   
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-liu-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-pov/HTML:     
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-liu-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-pov-00.htmlHTMLized: 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-liu-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-povAbstract:   
This document defines an IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)   Information 
Element for monitoring the state of Resource Public Key   Infrastructure (RPKI) 
based BGP Prefix Origin Validation.  The   Information Element enables network 
operators to collect and analyze   BGP route validation states (valid, invalid, 
not-found) to facilitate   the detection of potential route hijacks improving 
network   observability and security.The IETF SecretariatSubject:New Version 
Notification for draft-liu-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-pov-00.txtA new version of 
Internet-Draft draft-liu-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-pov-00.txt has beensuccessfully 
submitted by Yisong Liu and posted to theIETF repository.Name:     
draft-liu-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-povRevision: 00Title:    Export of BGP Prefix Origin 
Validation in IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)Date:     2026-02-10Group:    
Individual SubmissionPages:    8URL:      
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-liu-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-pov-00.txtStatus:   
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-liu-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-pov/HTML:     
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-liu-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-pov-00.htmlHTMLized: 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-liu-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-povAbstract:   
This document defines an IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)   Information 
Element for monitoring the state of Resource Public Key   Infrastructure (RPKI) 
based BGP Prefix Origin Validation.  The   Information Element enables network 
operators to collect and analyze   BGP route validation states (valid, invalid, 
not-found) to facilitate   the detection of potential route hijacks improving 
network   observability and security.The IETF Secretariat





_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to