Benoit, Your email prompted me to take another look at -08, and I found a typo.
In the final paragraph of section 3,1, in the text "An example of "Path-Congruent OAM" is the Virtual Circuit Connectivity Verification (VCCV), described is [RFC5085]", "described is" should be "described in". Cheers, Andy On Thu, Jul 3, 2025 at 5:34 AM Benoit Claise <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear all, > > Taking this email as an anchor for the longer discussion on the list... > Given that no objections were raised since almost one month, we conclude > that the proposal made by the authors in > draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-characterization-08 resolves this issue. Also, thanks > Andy and Matthew for the help to clarify the intent of RFC 5085 > > Regards, Joe and Benoit >
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
