Hi again, On Thu, 8 Feb 2018 09:31:51 +0100 Georg Lukas <[email protected]> wrote:
> I have prepared a Jabber Spam Fighting Manifesto, available at > https://github.com/ge0rg/jabber-spam-fighting-manifesto I have a specific question. This manifesto asks me to implement XEP-0157: https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0157.html This is to provide contact addresses for various purposes. So far so obvious. However I'm wondering a bit (and XEP-0157 doesn't answer that) how I best handle this. This document proposes a long list of possible contacts named abuse-addresses, admin-addresses, feedback-addresses, ... There's no hierarchy that says any of them are mandatory or more important than the others. In my case, and probably in many other cases, there is simply one contact for everything. What's the best practice here? I wish the XEP would be clearer. It would be more obvious to me to have one default contact (e.g. default-addresses) and that I set the others only if they are handled by separate people. I can of course just set them all, but it seems a bit silly. I'd propose that the spam manifesto makes the recommendation to implement XEP-0157 more clear, i.e. either saying "as a minimum you should set the abuse address" or saying "you should set *all* the addresses in XEP-0157". In any case, something that is sufficiently clear that we don't have to argue later whether something complies with the manifesto. -- Hanno Böck https://hboeck.de/ mail/jabber: [email protected] GPG: FE73757FA60E4E21B937579FA5880072BBB51E42
pgp4kisX9eENu.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
