Am Sonntag 06 Januar 2008 schrieb Wolfgang Rosenauer: > Marcus Meissner wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 11:07:40PM +0100, Wolfgang Rosenauer wrote: > >> So that leaves two basic questions for me: > >> > >> What is the purpose of a sub-package if it is always hard required by > >> the main package? > >> > >> And what I understood is the recommended (or even mandatory?) way to > >> handle language package dependencies the one described here: > >> http://en.opensuse.org/Software_Management/Dependencies/Language > >> > >> If that's correct I think that the %lang_package macro is useless since > >> it doesn't define a locale provides. the bundles provide the locale, the mc-lang package will always be pulled in, so there is no need to provide the languages.
> >> > >> So what's the policy (or recommendation) actually? > > > > The %name-lang is also provided by the bundle-lang-* RPMs, so we can > > leave out languages... > > Ok, so it works for those bundled in bundle-lang-* RPMs that way. No, but we made it a general recommendation to split out langs so we can bundle as needed (if mc goes on GNOME CD) Greetings, Stephan -- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
