Hi folks:

There are several libraries that ships binary utils that are not needed
for the library to work by itself but the library packaging policy nor
any other document covers the naming of this packages.

so, how you think the should be called ?

libfooN-util

libfoo-util

libfoo-bin

libfooN-bin

Comments :?


-- 
"You don't have to burn books to destroy a culture. Just get people to
stop reading them." --Ray Bradbury

Cristian Rodríguez R.
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH
Research & Development
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to