On the call the votes were very clear to accept the PR (not reject it). So I'm again rejecting the request to reject the PR - it would be better to express such votes in positive terms.
-1 Tim. On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 9:06 AM Dr Paul Dale <[email protected]> wrote: > -0 > > Pauli > > On 20/4/21 8:23 pm, Nicola Tuveri wrote: > > Following up on > > https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg02407.html > > <https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg02407.html> > > > we had a discussion on this during last week OTC meeting, and opened a > > vote limited exclusively to the matter of rejecting PR#14759. > > > > We lost the record of the votes collected during the call, so opening > > it officially today with a clean slate. > > > > > > ---------------- > > topic: Reject PR#14759 > > Proposed by Nicola Tuveri > > Public: yes > > opened: 2021-04-20 > > closed: 2021-mm-dd > > accepted: yes/no (for: X, against: Y, abstained: Z, not voted: T) > > Matt [ ] > > Mark [ ] > > Pauli [ ] > > Viktor [ ] > > Tim [ ] > > Richard [ ] > > Shane [ ] > > Tomas [ ] > > Kurt [ ] > > Matthias [ ] > > Nicola [+1] > > > > > >
