Hi all,
taking up again the discussion from openssl-project where I suggested to (ab)use
the 3.0.0 milestone for release blockers, (see link and citation at the end of
the mail),
I propose to add a new label for this purpose instead. In fact, I already
created the label
[urgent: release blocker] (see link below)
and will add the mentioned tickets within shortly. So you can take a look and
tell
me whether you like it or not. (If not, no problem. I'll just delete the label
again.)
Matthias
BTW: It took me all my force of will to resist the temptation of making a pun
by naming the label [urgent: beta blocker].
References:
==========
[urgent: release blocker]:
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/labels/urgent%3A%20release%20blocker
[openssl-project message]:
https://mta.openssl.org/pipermail/openssl-project/2020-September/002191.html
> > > For a more accurate and timely public overview over the current state of
> > > the blockers,
> > > it might be helpful to manage them via the 3.0.0 milestone
> > >
> > > https://github.com/openssl/openssl/milestone/15
> > >
> > > Some of the tickets listed below were already associated to the
> > > milestone, the others
> > > were added by me now.
> >
> > I think the 3.0.0 milestone is what we expect to be in the
> > 3.0.0 release, not the beta release. That is bug fixes don't need
> > to be in the beta release, but if it adds new functionallity it
> > needs to be in the beta release.
>
> I was aware of this subtlety but I thought that we just could (ab-)use the
> milestone for
> the beta1 release and reuse it later for the final release, instead of
> creating a new milestone.
>
> Practically all of the relevant PRs are associated to the [3.0 New Core +
> FIPS] GitHub Project
> anyway, so it would be possible to remove the post-beta PRs from the
> milestone and restore
> them later. (In my mind, I see project managers running away screeming...)
>
> Matthias
>
>
> [3.0 New Core + FIPS]: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/projects/2