> I was thinking OSSL_LIBCTX?
That's a good choice and consistent with how we name the variable in most (but
not all) places:
OPENSSL_CTX *libctx;
I volunteer to raise a pull request which does a scripted bulk rename, as soon
as we have made
a decision. Ideally, the bulk renaming should go in shortly before the next
alpha. Having it
automated by a script would ease rebasing of other still unmerged pull requests
over the change.
Matthias
> -----Original Message-----
> From: SHANE LONTIS <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, July 24, 2020 9:43 AM
> To: Dr. Matthias St. Pierre <[email protected]>
> Cc: Richard Levitte <[email protected]>; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: API renaming
>
> I was thinking OSSL_LIBCTX?
>
