On 29/10/2019 12:34, Matt Caswell wrote: > > > On 29/10/2019 12:24, Matthias St. Pierre wrote: >> >> It might be useful to add more reasons for why the issue is resolved. >> OTOH we should watch out that we don't create too many labels. >> >> "resolved: fixed" >> "resolved: answered" > > Not sure about the "resolved: fixed" one...most of the time where we > resolve an issue by fixing it, it gets closed automatically. Adding a > label probably doesn't add much. I suppose it might be useful in the > case where someone reports a bug that is *already* fixed in a later version. I found myself needing to use "resolved: answered" so I added it. Matt
- AW: Confirmed bug labels Dr. Matthias St. Pierre
- Re: AW: Confirmed bug labels Matt Caswell
- Re: AW: Confirmed bug labels Matthias St. Pierre
- Re: AW: Confirmed bug labels Matthias St. Pierre
- Re: AW: Confirmed bug labels Matthias St. Pierre
- Re: AW: Confirmed bug labels Matt Caswell
- Re: AW: Confirmed bug labels Matt Caswell
- Re: AW: Confirmed bug labels Matthias St. Pierre
- Re: AW: Confirmed bug labels Matt Caswell
- Re: AW: Confirmed bug labels Matthias St. Pierre
- Re: AW: Confirmed bug labels Matt Caswell
- Re: AW: Confirmed bug labels Matthias St. Pierre
- Re: AW: Confirmed bug labels Matt Caswell
- Re: AW: Confirmed bug labels Matthias St. Pierre
- Re: Confirmed bug labels Salz, Rich
- Re: Confirmed bug labels Matthias St. Pierre
